Any plausible recognition platform is based on integrity. Fair and transparent jury implies that awards are not devalued.
There are some criteria that define expectations of nominees. Viable standards enable assessors to review performance in an objective manner.
Credibility is also increased through independent review panels. In case the decisions are made on the basis of systemized assessment, as opposed to subjectivity, recognition is legitimized.
Openness also develops trust in the participants. Understanding between selection processes is avoided through proper communication.
Equitable systems of judgment promote participation. When people believe in the evaluation structure, they will be more prone to the nomination processes.
Professionalism is supported by organised evaluation systems at ANDTHEWINNERis.ORG. Promotion must be based on merit, hard work and quantifiable performance.
Such awards which maintain transparency are time-tested. The integrity will convert the symbolic recognition to significant honor.